Subject	I personally prefer the 3" B&B quad oval
Posted by	bartz32tt on November 09, 2012 at 3:50 PM
	This message has been viewed 95 times.
In Reply To	Searching for the best 3" Catback for my 2+2 posted by Fearspect on November 09, 2012 at 11:05 AM
Message	best looks and sound IMO ________________Sig Separator________________________ Parting out my entire 1990 twin turbo! Please email me for needed parts!
Follow Ups	Searching for the best 3" Catback for my 2+2 - Fearspect 11:05:43 11/09/12 Turbo or N/A? 3" will be more detrimental if its N/A (n/m) - johnnysombrero 12:08:07 11/09/12 Sorry, should have been clear that it's a TT - Fearspect 12:38:12 11/09/12 Specialty Z Hands Down (n/m) - Zski 15:09:04 11/09/12 they don't make any for 2+2 as stated in OP. (n/m) - bartz32tt 15:48:58 11/09/12 In this case B&B would be better. (n/m) - John@Z1 17:01:09 11/09/12 I personally prefer the 3" B&B quad oval - bartz32tt 15:50:15 11/09/12 i had the b&b 3'' exhaust with 4.5'' quad-ovalled tips - vulcanrush 16:29:23 11/09/12 Me too. The 2.5 K rpm drone is bad. (n/m) - Got Z? 17:13:21 11/09/12 un-f-ing true! (n/m) - genic 19:27:10 11/10/12 Resonated or non-resonated? - white22sky 17:46:04 11/09/12 resonated with hf cats, sorry Cody, i should have been more - vulcanrush 19:48:08 11/09/12 B&B is the best for looks and sound imo. Theres 3" 2+2 for - itZjoker 16:33:46 11/09/12 The nature of the 2+2 fuel tank position forces the bends - Bernie (NoVA) 21:27:23 11/09/12 Pictures: - Bernie (NoVA) 22:44:42 11/10/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.